What is required of an author when discussing controversial issues in an introduction?

Presenting both sides of an issue in the introduction of a research paper is essential for establishing a balanced perspective on controversial topics. This approach helps to provide a comprehensive overview, allowing readers to understand the complexity of the issue at hand. By acknowledging differing viewpoints, the author demonstrates critical thinking, sets a foundation for informed discussion, and enhances the credibility of the work.

When both sides are presented, it also encourages critical dialogue and allows readers to engage with the material more effectively, fostering an environment where they can form their own opinions based on well-rounded information. This practice aligns with academic standards of fairness and objectivity, which are crucial in scholarly writing.

In contrast, the other options do not contribute to a fair and scholarly discussion. Developing ad hominem arguments focuses on attacking opponents rather than their ideas, which undermines the integrity of the discourse. Citing authorities out of context misrepresents information and can mislead readers, damaging the author’s credibility. Disguising bias compromises transparency and can hinder the author’s ability to engage with the audience responsibly.